Re: PRC, etc. (part 3 of 3)
— Re: the key —
Summary (details follow)
There are indicators that 70+ members of the FBI reviewed my threat-analysis in August 2021.
Since then, I haven’t heard from any member of the FBI.
Re: “indicators that 70+ . . .”
Provided on July 25, 2021, in person, to employees of Microsoft:
print-outs of the first 10 pages of youinsimulation.substack.com/p/part-1 (each page included said URL)
as cover-sheets for said print-outs, print-outs of the below:
My Microsoft-/Amazon-/VC-praised* AI-preneurship; reducing** ransomware attacks via eliminating a related threat to many people; etc.
— Summary (“x + … + y = z” format; details attached) —
Via said AI-preneurship (AIP), I identified said threat (T2M).
+
indicators that T2M is being funded partly via many ransomware attacks
+
Leveraging my work that builds on AIP is a/the key to preventing/subduing T2M (PST).
+
A key to PST ASAP is my finders’-fee offer (mFFO) that FITS Microsoft’s Rolodex.
+
BetaNews.com (7/22/21): “A new study from Atlas VPN shows that 51 percent of exploits sold on underground cybercriminal forums are for Microsoft products.”
=
Microsoft can benefit/profit triply by expediting the formation of the public-private partnership that mFFO is designed to yield.
* For links to the praise, along with excerpts, see the Web page that’s the source of the attached.
** i.e., precluding many
— Microsoft references —
[redacted]
— Re: contacting me (given indicators that my work on PST has put me on the radar of hackers who are part of T2M) —
“Burner” phone: [redacted] (not purchased by me; used only re: PST; can receive texts and voice calls)
— Related precautions —
I work on PST away from home—and away from my non-burner devices (e.g., at a friend’s office, where I typed this and printed the attached).
My burner phone doesn’t ring (i.e., incoming calls vibrate the phone).
Mailed to the FBI’s Seattle office on August 4, 2021: 1) a paper copy of said 10 pages, 2) a paper copy of said cover-sheet, 3) a note re: my contact with Microsoft employees.
USPS tracking #: 70210950000127447946
New-visitor stats for youinsimulation.substack.com:
Re: the discrepancy between the two visitor-counts above
Re: the likelihood that many/most of the visitors were members of the FBI
On Twitter, I’ve never followed the FBI or any of its members.
On 8/27, Twitter’s who-to-follow recommender system started recommending that I follow the FBI:
My Twitter profile, which is outdated, includes the link shown below:
New-visitor stats for comedyvstrump2024.substack.com:
Re: I haven’t heard from any member of the FBI
As seen in part 1 of this write-up, it’s far from a given that the FBI will act on my T2M-/PRC-analysis, en route to the Biden administration leveraging my work. KWs re: “as seen” possibilities: enemy within (e.g., non-Ps within not wanting to be on the radar of Ps within, en route to being targeted by other Ps); next-gen variant of USG-protected-BCCI. Related:
From 2007 book The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11, for which the author received a Pulitzer prize:
“[FBI agent] O’Neill was particularly concerned, as the millennium approached [i.e., fall of 1999], al-Qaeda would seize the moment to dramatize its war with America. He was certain that Islamic terrorists had established a beachhead in America. This view was very much different from the one that the leadership of the bureau endorsed. [FBI] Director Freeh repeatedly stressed in White House meetings that al-Qaeda posed no domestic threat [my emphasis].”
“Al-Qaeda’s fortunes began to improve after the coalition’s fatwa to kill Americans wherever they might be found. . . . March 1998, only a month after the fatwa . . .”
From Wikipedia:
In 1996, bin Laden personally engineered a plot to assassinate United States President Bill Clinton while the president was in Manila for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. However, intelligence agents intercepted a message before the motorcade was to leave, and alerted the US Secret Service. Agents later discovered a bomb planted under a bridge. . . .
On August 7, 1998, al-Qaeda bombed the US embassies in East Africa, killing 224 people, including 12 Americans.
From 2013 book Mafia Summit: J. Edgar Hoover, the Kennedy Brothers, and the Meeting That Unmasked the Mob:
Before Apalachin, before, say, 12:40 p.m. on November 14, 1957, there was no mob. No organized crime at all in America. Citizens believed this because the country’s head copper [i.e., FBI director Hoover] told it to them again and again, obsessively, as he did almost everything, like a bulldog, the breed Hoover famously resembled. The director repeated the line so often that it became a sort of reality.
. . . Which meant the mob threat went largely unchallenged in any focused, plenary way. The criminal conspiracy comprised mainly of Sicilian Mafia immigrants grew into a national cartel totally unhampered by the FBI. “Hoover’s not a problem,” one mob boss was caught saying on a phone wiretap. The brutal campaigns of extortion and violence, the beatings, the murders, the organized crime tax that all citizens paid whether they knew it or not, the corrupting influence of the mob, all proceeded unchecked by the nation’s premier federal law enforcement bureau.
Recalled United States district attorney for New York Robert M. Morgenthau: “For pretty much close to twenty-five years, organized crime had a free run. I mean from the end of Prohibition down to 1960. And I think it kind of had woven into at least part of the fabric of society.”
From The Watchdogs Didn’t Bark: How the NSA Failed to Protect America from the 9/11 Attacks:
Kiriakou was bothered by Rodriguez in a way he was not by most others he worked near, and he does not mince words. “You work with so many sociopaths in the agency [i.e., CIA] and recognize them as potentially dangerous, but he’s a psychopath. I really believe that.”
Rodriguez was making an astounding leap up the hierarchy, to lead, among other things, the powerful new program, which they were calling “Renditions, Detentions, and Interrogations,” or RDI. When George Tenet personally made the call to promote Jose Rodriguez to head the counter-terror division, Kiriakou believes it was the DCI acknowledging he understood the nature of his RDI program. “I think Tenet was being advised by [his spies director] James Pavitt. Pavitt knew Rodriguez very well. The message from the seventh floor was,” Kiriakou believes, “‘If we’re really taking the gloves off, then we’re going to put this psychopath in charge.’”
From 2012 book How to Get Away with Murder in America: Drug Lords, Dirty Pols, Obsessed Cops, and the Quiet Man Who Became the CIA’s Master Killer:
[T]he two halves of Prado’s life in the 1990s—murder suspect/stellar CIA officer—made no sense. When I initially searched for the case files of the investigation into Prado—conducted jointly by the FBI and the Miami-Dade Police Department—I discovered they’d disappeared from the MDPD’s records bureau. When I located them elsewhere through a tip from a federal investigator, they were far more extensive than I had expected. There were some three thousand pages, including interviews with eyewitnesses who placed Prado at numerous crimes. I eventually interviewed more than two dozen people involved with the investigation—cops, FBI agents, federal prosecutors, and witnesses—who provided a disturbing portrait of a case abandoned because of CIA intervention, political maneuvering, and possibly corruption. The evidence against Prado was so compelling that one investigator from the case described him as “technically, a serial killer.”
“It was a miscarriage of justice that Prado never faced charges,” says Mike Fisten, the lead homicide investigator on the case. “The CIA fought us tooth and nail, and basically told us to go fuck ourselves.”
Another investigator from the case, who is now a Florida law enforcement official, said, “You can’t indict people like Prado. It doesn’t work that way.”
Later he e-mailed me: “Your target is bad news and dangerous. Be careful.”
When I phoned him, he said, “Forget this story. I dropped Prado’s name on a friend of mine from the CIA and he said, ‘Leave this one alone. You don’t want to fuck with this guy.’ ”
“What do you think?” I asked him.
“You’re going to get whacked.”
No public official I’d interviewed had ever made such a comment. Yet his warning is in keeping with the amazing story of Ricky Prado and his rise from the criminal underworld into the top echelons of the national-security establishment. It’s a story you’d expect to encounter in the twilight stages of a corrupt dictatorship, but this one takes place mostly in Miami. It centers on Prado’s long relationship with [Cuban drug-kingpin Albert] San Pedro, and on the cop who began pursuing them more than two decades ago and still hopes to put them in prison for murder. In protecting Prado, the CIA arguably allowed a new type of mole—an agent not of a foreign government but of American criminal interests—to penetrate its command.
— End of “Re: the key” —
KWs re: I identified T2M/PRC via mAIP
my efforts to identify online markets that complement CE(-for-AI); burgeoning science of human reproduction; superstar-biased technological change; epigenetics; gamete market
Re: my FFO
When the ~5 finders are able to connect me with President Biden, the ~5 and I will sign a legally-binding FFO.
Formation of a partnership between the president and MPS would trigger the payout to finders of 20% of the equity in MPS.
Re: you(r company) can PROFIT from my FFO
Said connect-me yielding said partnership seems LIKELY, given that:
Again, the president would receive 64% of the equity in MPS in exchange for delegating emergency/war powers to MPS.
The exchange would make MPS a de facto monopolist.
Post-exchange, then, the 64% would yield a Rockefeller-ian fortune ASAP.
So, post-exchange, finders of said kind would be able to monetize their equity stakes any time after receipt (e.g., I would borrow money—using my equity stake in MPS as collateral—and purchase each finder’s shares as soon as any/all were for sale).
Re: my FFO is a textbook approach to raising awareness of T2M/PRC, en route to PSing . . .
From 2021 book Averting Catastrophe: Decision Theory for COVID-19, Climate Change, and Potential Disasters of All Kinds, by an Administrator of President Obama’s White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs:
In special circumstances, you might consider avoiding the worst-case scenario and thus following the maximin principle, which calls for eliminating the worst of the worst cases. The strongest cases for following that rule would involve three factors: (1) Knightian uncertainty, understood as an inability to assign probabilities to various options; (2) catastrophic or grave consequences from one option, but not from other options; and (3) low or relatively low costs, or low or relatively low benefits foregone, as a result of choosing the option that avoids the worst-case scenario.
Re: (3): If I pay out a 20% finders’-fee and the president owns 64% of MPS, I’ll own 16% of the Standard Oil of the AI economy. For me, the marginal utility of the “missing” 84% would be zero. And, in exchange for this zero, I’d have secured insurance that: 1) I perceive to have substantial value, 2) I can’t secure any other way.
Precedent for PSing T2M/PRC via leveraging social networks
Such leveraging was the key to experts gaining control of America’s Covid response.
From 2021 best-seller The Premonition: A Pandemic Story, by Michael Lewis:
The only way to get attention for this new tool for disease control, Glass decided, was to write it up in a paper for an academic journal. The scientists at Sandia National Labs worked under the highest security clearance in the federal government, called “Q clearance,” and were prohibited from revealing their work without first seeking approval. The work was his kid’s science fair project, but he was now taking it as seriously as anything he did at Sandia. So he explained the situation to his superiors and wrote up a long paper, which, at length, they allowed him to publish. He sent it to Science and Nature and to other, more obscure journals of medical science. “Every one of them just returned it to me unread because I wasn’t known in their field,” he said. “So then I got really worried.” When asked about himself, which he seldom was, as he spent so much of his time alone in thought, Bob Glass described himself as “an extreme introvert.” It violated his nature to reach out personally to people in the field of communicable disease and seek their help. But he did it anyway. He found the names of professional epidemiologists who claimed to be using computer models to study disease spread and sent them his paper, along with a note. “They wouldn’t even return my emails,” he said. “They just didn’t respond. So then I got pissed. I had this fear: a pandemic will occur, and no one would do anything right. I thought I was dead. I thought we were all dead. Then I remembered the guy at the VA.”
A year and a half earlier, Laura had gone to Washington, DC, to visit her aunt. Over dinner one night, she told her aunt’s boyfriend, an infectious-disease specialist who worked for the Department of Veterans Affairs, about her science fair project. “You should write that up and publish it,” he said with enthusiasm. He said he’d never heard of anything like it. When she returned home, she told her father about the dinner. “I thought, ‘Jeez, this is going to take a lot of work,’” he’d said, but he agreed to turn the science fair project into a serious academic paper on disease control, authored jointly. The VA guy had already had one big effect on their work, Bob Glass thought; maybe he could have another. It troubled him deeply to use his sister’s boyfriend to get attention for a scientific discovery, but he didn’t know anyone else in the federal government in Washington, DC. “You just don’t do this in science,” Glass said. “But I said, I’m going to do something someone my age never does. I’m going to go around the system. I write him an email and attach the paper and ask: ‘Do you know anyone who needs to see this?’”
At that point, he’d spent the better part of six months trying to get the attention of experts in disease control. Inside of six hours, he had a call from Richard Hatchett. “He said, ‘We’re in the White House,’” recalled Bob Glass. “‘When can you come and talk to us?’”
. . .
He and Richard and others had spent years creating and selling the ideas that would, if quickly seized upon, prevent a lot of Americans from dying. Those ideas were useful, and yet no one in authority seemed willing to use them. “We were going nuts,” said Carter. Each of the Wolverines went into their contact lists to look for what Carter called “high-value nodes.” People they knew who might influence American policy. . . .
The goal was to find at least one state to take the lead and roll out an aggressive response to the virus, introduce the social interventions outlined in the pandemic plan, and create a domino effect. “We had to create an epidemic for an idea,” said Carter. At some point Duane Caneva realized that he had something to add. . . . In his two years inside Trump’s Department of Homeland Security, Duane had had various dealings, many acrimonious, with various public officials in states that shared a border with Mexico. One struck him as just the type to grab hold of an entire state and turn it into an example that might lead the nation. “Just got off the phone with Dr. Charity Dean,” Duane wrote . . .
. . .
Charity walked them through what had happened back in 1918 and what was happening again, in only slightly different form. She explained how, six weeks earlier, she had arrived at a fairly good estimate of all the important traits of the virus, and she said that once you knew these things about the virus, you could predict its future. She did not tell them that she had spent the previous six weeks in conversations with maybe the world’s greatest redneck epidemiologist [i.e., Carter]. Park and Patil mostly just listened to her and asked questions.
. . . After a couple of hours with Charity, Park and Patil decided that the most useful thing they could do for the state of California was to deliver the contents of her mind onto [Governor] Gavin Newsom’s desk. “Our only job was to make it possible for Charity to talk through a model,” recalled Park. “Our job was to take everything in her brain and get it to the governor.”
. . . Park and Patil presented the model’s output to Governor Newsom’s senior advisers. “When we showed them what the model was saying, it sucked the air out of the room,” said Park. The next day, Governor Newsom issued the country’s first statewide stay-at-home order.
. . .
What Charity couldn’t figure out was how, or even if, what she said on the calls found its way into the ears of the decision makers [in the U.S. federal government]—and who those people were. At one point she put the question to James Lawler. “James,” she asked, “who exactly is in charge of this pandemic?” “Nobody,” he replied. “But if you want to know who is sort of in charge, it’s sort of us.”
Bonus motivations for you to act on my FFO
Toward PSing said global alliance between Ks and Ps (e.g., PSing in part via combating global kleptocracy), I’d draft/conscript first the children of American HF-profiteers . . .
From Joseph and His Brothers (my emphases):
“[O]ld-fashioned, defiant feudal lords, whose reactionary mode of life was of no benefit to the general welfare and had long been a thorn in the side of the new state.”
“[Joseph:] ‘[T]hey will have to deliver up their sons and daughters to Egypt in payment or as security, and thus will they be bound to Pharaoh’s throne, so that henceforth one can rely on their loyalty.’”
. . . and I’d fund (part of) said PSing by “clawing back” gain$ from HF . . .
From Joseph and His Brothers:
“As a statesman, Joseph used this opportunity to coerce these lords to join the times. They were the primary targets of the expropriations [my emphasis] . . .”
From a 2019 article in The Atlantic:
The moment the president declares a “national emergency”—a decision that is entirely within his discretion—more than 100 special provisions become available to him. . . . For instance, the president can, with the flick of his pen, activate laws allowing him to . . . freeze Americans’ bank accounts [my emphasis].
Re: presentation-errors above
Copying from one Substack page and pasting to another often/typically causes some formatting bugs to appear on the new/recipient page. I’m debugging as time permits . . .
From 2012 book APE: Author, Publisher, Entrepreneur — How to Publish a Book, co-authored by Guy Kawasaki, a former chief evangelist at Apple:
Every time I turn in the “final” copy of a book [Kawasaki has (co-)authored twelve books], I believe that it’s perfect. In APE’s case, upward of seventy-five people reviewed the manuscript, and [co-author] Shawn [Welch] and I read it until we were sick of it. Take a wild guess at how many errors our copy editor found. The answer is 1,500. [APE is 410 pages.]